Informal Sperm Donation in Western Australia
- AI: Not Recognized
- NI: Not Recognized
- Sperm donor agreement: Unknown
Key Provisions:
- Parentage:
- Under the Human Reproductive Technology Act 1991 (WA) and Family Court Act 1997 (WA):
- “The woman who gives birth to a child conceived by a fertilisation procedure … is … the mother” (Family Court Act 1997, Section 16).
- “A man … is presumed to be a parent … if he is married to … the child’s mother … at the time of the birth” or “if he cohabited with the mother … for at least 6 months ending within a period commencing 12 months before and ending 3 months after the birth” (Family Court Act 1997, Section 188(1)(a) and (e)), unless rebutted.
- For ART, the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) applies federally: “If … a child is born to a woman as a result of … an artificial conception procedure … and the woman was married to, or a de facto partner of, another person … the child is a child of the woman and the other intended parent” and “any man who produced the semen used … is not the father” (Section 60H(1) and (2)), but this applies only to couples.
- Under the Human Reproductive Technology Act 1991 (WA) and Family Court Act 1997 (WA):
- Assisted Reproduction:
- The Human Reproductive Technology Act 1991 (WA) defines: “‘artificial fertilisation procedure’ means … an artificial insemination procedure … or an in vitro fertilisation procedure” (Section 3(1)), regulated by: “A person shall not carry out … an artificial fertilisation procedure … unless … licensed” (Section 21(1)). Note: This mandates clinic involvement, unlike QLD and ACT’s broader definitions.
- Informal sperm donation (e.g., at-home AI) is not recognized as a regulated procedure—parentage defaults to Family Court Act 1997, Section 188.
- Sperm Donor Agreements:
- The Act states: “Where … a woman … becomes pregnant … by an artificial fertilisation procedure … a man … who produced sperm used … is not the father … if he is not the husband or de facto partner” (Section 23(1)(a)). Note: Informal sperm donation is not recognized as conferring this exclusion—Section 23 applies to clinic-based ART, and donors to single women or outside licensed settings may be parents if intent or involvement is proven (e.g., Groth v Banks [2013] FamCA 430).
- No specific WA law enforces informal agreements—courts assess “best interests of the child” under the Family Court Act 1997 (WA) (Section 202), mirroring Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) (Section 60CC).
- Surrogacy:
- The Surrogacy Act 2008 (WA) permits altruistic surrogacy: “A court may make a parentage order … if satisfied … the surrogacy arrangement is not a commercial surrogacy arrangement … and the order is in the best interests of the child” (Section 17(b) and (e)), defining “commercial surrogacy arrangement” as involving “payment … other than … reasonable expenses” (Section 8).
- Parentage transfers post-birth with conditions like surrogate consent (Section 13). Commercial surrogacy is prohibited (Section 8).
- Parentage Agreements:
- For surrogacy, “a parentage order … transfers parentage” under the Surrogacy Act 2008 (WA) (Section 17). Informal agreements aren’t binding but influence rulings under the Family Court Act 1997 (WA) “best interests” test (Section 202), mirroring Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) (Section 60CC).